Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aqua GT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to East Point Software. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aqua GT[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Videogameplayer99 (talk) 03:40, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom, could not find enough significant sources._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 04:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the developing entity East Point Software per WP:GNG but also WP:ATD. --Izno (talk) 04:54, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I AfD'd East Point Software, doesn't seem notable either._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 02:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ATD-R Redirect to developer as valid search term before nominating for deletion. If the dev article is later deleted, so be it, but until then, that's the best course. czar 07:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to developer. L3X1 (distænt write) 14:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.